Saturday, June 11, 2011

navy anchor tattoos

images NAVY ANCHOR LOGO DECAL STICKER navy anchor tattoos. Birds with Anchor Tattoo
  • Birds with Anchor Tattoo


  • number30
    04-17 02:20 PM
    Hello,

    Thanks a lot for your answers.

    Despite the situation sounds illegal and I agree it is - I didn't wanted to make something illegal and was just waiting for my employer to fill the papers.

    I am as well what they call a skilled worker, I basically get a o1 visa to work as manager for a big company and I don't give a fuck - but yeah I get another job offer and didn't waited to have the new visa to start. You know sometimes you can take bad decisions, people can tell you things which never happen, and that's unfortunately how life is.

    Last week I get another job offer, it's real and not illegal - I worked a lot to get this offer and spent so much time working hard instead to have fun.

    I am currently filling a new o1 with a lawyer and plan anyway to leave the US asap. Maybe I will never have this visa and will probably be bar for 3 years but I really need to try to make everything possible.

    When I get the first job offer in the US - I was working as manager in Europe, and everything was pretty fine. I accepted this job, sold and gave all the stuff I owned to come here, in the United States, to work. Today I have no apartment or place to live in my country and I know as well that when you get a non immigrant visa you are supposed to can get back to your country easily but it's like hard to keep 2 rent and 2 places.

    I will be very grateful if you can give me your point of view about my case and share your experiences.

    Thanks a lot


    If he has canceled the visa that is not over stay. It is illigal stay which quite lesser offence then the over stay. What is your I-94 expiry date? If it is not surpassed yet you are not subjected to any bars.




    wallpaper Birds with Anchor Tattoo navy anchor tattoos. I got out of the Navy long
  • I got out of the Navy long


  • lp2007
    01-19 07:40 PM
    We are all proud of our accomplishments, EB2 or EB3 or EB1 , the degrees we have earned, the jobs we do and the achievements we have in our career. The relationships we have made and the list goes on.
    I don't think being in a category of EB GC queue should define if you can be proud of an EB3 immigrant.

    You almost make it sound like did a EB3 applicant become a "slumdog millionaire" ? :)




    navy anchor tattoos. Anchor Tattoo T-Shirts
  • Anchor Tattoo T-Shirts


  • NikNikon
    May 24th, 2005, 09:21 AM
    Cool, I learned something new today. I guess I knew the concept of the polarizer but had yet to learn all of the ins and outs. Thanks Josh.





    Linear vs. Circular has mainly to do with whether it works with metering and autofocus sensors in modern cameras. Both polarizers rotate and function similarly (I'm not sure if there is any difference in the effect shown in the image, but I doubt it).

    Anyway, an unevenly polarized sky happens not because the polarizer is not rotated properly / enough, but rather because the camera is not quite at a 90 degree angle to the sun; this uneven polarization becomes more noticeable with wide angle lenses (to a point, then as even wider lenses are used, the sky will get dark in the middle and lighter on the edges even right at 90 degrees from the sun).

    sending money 2 india [Archive] - Immigration Voice

    View Full Version : sending money 2 india





    2011 I got out of the Navy long navy anchor tattoos. Navy anchor tattoos
  • Navy anchor tattoos


  • dealsnet
    07-24 12:44 PM
    If your appeal for I-140 & I-485 in process, you are legal, and if you have unexpired EAD, you can work.

    If you have H1 renewed (less than 6 years) you can work irrespective of I-485 appeal result. If you are more than 6 years in H1B, you have to go back, if your appeal (MTR) is denied. (more than 6 years of extension is based on approved I-140)
    WHAT IS YOUR LAWYER'S OPINION ???
    I have question Need Urgent reply

    I have H1B valid till FEB 2009 but it is not stamped on my passport. I entered in US with AP. and my I140 got denied I have sent the appeal and received the receipt for appeal. but after sending I140 appeal my I485 got denied. I have sent appeal for I485. Not received any receipt yet.
    I have renewed my EAD and travel document before I485 denial

    my question Is,am i legal to stay in US. I am just confused reading different posts with different response.
    can some some body help me understand this situation.



    more...

    navy anchor tattoos. Navy anchor tattoos
  • Navy anchor tattoos


  • vparam
    08-21 12:35 PM
    It is my turn to receive the "Notice mailed welcoming the new permanent resident" today. My depenedents are yet to receive this mail. This forum, Immigration-law, Immigration portal by Rajiv Khanna and many other immigration lawyers' websites like Murthy's etc were very useful to understand the immigration laws.
    I did everything myself (EB2-NIW - India) - I140, I485, AP and EAD and my PD (I140 RD) and I485 RD are 09-29-2005.
    I did make a one time conribution of $100.00 to IV.
    Thanks a lot. All the best to all.

    Congrats!!!!




    navy anchor tattoos. tinytia#39;s Navy Anchor and Star
  • tinytia#39;s Navy Anchor and Star


  • bestofall
    07-31 03:41 PM
    is any one interested for Coor pool / Charter Bus for DC rally ?
    May be we should work on that way ..

    If any one ..pls PM me



    more...

    navy anchor tattoos. the anchor tattoo that us
  • the anchor tattoo that us


  • h1bemployee
    02-26 05:14 PM
    wandmaker ..Please read Phony postings and do not respond to these guys , they are just playing .. I m surprised senior members are not understanding the intend of the posts .

    What can we help if he had problems with employer ? what can we help if he had h1-h4-h1 issues ? Every one just relax and stop replying .

    I know every one wants to help others in our community but think twice before replying

    I am not posting this for timepass.... This is a real problem....

    My employer gave me Mar 12th as deadline.....

    wandmaker... I am really sorry ...

    here are the details:

    when my employer got the RFE.. he asked me to send the following documents
    # Previous company experience letters(from INdia)
    #All Education certificates
    # letter from the End client
    # current resume
    # w2 form

    and he asked me to notarize all these documents. I sent all the requested documents except the end client letter, because my client said that its not their company policy to provide these type of letters.

    There are two sub vendors between my client and employer. So I got a letter from one of the subvendor(he is in CA) that I am working in this company through them. In the letter he mentioned other sub vendor name also.

    after sending these docs to USCIS ... My employer came back to me saying that he need more detailed documents.

    # USCIS is doubting that I am working in CA not in NJ as the subvendor is from CA . But we provided the documents saying that I am working in NJ and I have filed my taxes from NJ only. I have my driving license from NJ.

    # My employer filed H1b Amendment (filed in Aug 2007) saying that I work as a computer support specialist(eventhough I am working as a Systems Engineer) to support the salary pay. USCIS is saying that its not a H1B level job.

    If I can tranafer my H1b to the main vendor , I will get a good pay and They can say I am working as Systems engineer which is h1b level job.

    Can I transfer my H1 in this situation?. Please help.




    2010 Anchor Tattoo T-Shirts navy anchor tattoos. NAVY ANCHOR LOGO DECAL STICKER
  • NAVY ANCHOR LOGO DECAL STICKER


  • Mount Soche
    09-23 12:07 PM
    I am a July 17th filer and my attorney received my receipts for EAD, AP and AOS on September 18th. The attorney says I should get my copy of the receipts but I haven't received anything as of today (September 23rd). Lawyer gave me receipt numbers and will send me a copy but I don't think it is necessary to have the originals.



    more...

    navy anchor tattoos. Anchor Tattoos,anchor Tattoo
  • Anchor Tattoos,anchor Tattoo


  • Sheila Danzig
    07-25 10:26 AM
    In all of the years that I have been doing evaluations I have seen only two cases where a GC had a NOIR (Notice of intent to revoke) for education reasons. Both had 3 year degrees. One case was several years ago and approved and the other was recent and just submitted.

    Do you know the reason for your notice?

    Hi all,

    My I-140 was approved 2.5 years back and I-485 was also approved more than an year back.

    But, today the status on my I-140 got changed to "REQUEST FOR INITIAL EVIDENCE SENT, CASE PLACED ON HOLD". I am not sure, why did they reopen the case again. I checked with my company and they assured me that they didn't revoke my I-140.

    Could anyone suggest me what's happening to my case. Has anyone seen an similar kind of an issue and suggest me how to proceed ?

    Thanks in advance !




    hair Navy anchor tattoos navy anchor tattoos. Anchor Tattoo and Giant Squid
  • Anchor Tattoo and Giant Squid


  • roseball
    08-07 10:37 AM
    1> Marriage certificate.
    2.> I-864 + employment letter (copy will do) + tax returns (last 3 years) + W2s (last 3 years) + paystubs for last 3 months + bank letter
    3.> Proof of status for her (I-94s, I-20s, I-797, EAD, etc)
    4.> Copy of her complete passport (including expired one if it exists)
    5.> Her birth certificate / affidavits
    6.> Copy of your I-140 approval
    7.> 6 photographs of her
    8.> Filing fees

    You also need to include the filled in Form I-134.

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-134.pdf



    more...

    navy anchor tattoos. SAILOR WITH ANCHOR TATTOO
  • SAILOR WITH ANCHOR TATTOO


  • chanduv23
    11-14 09:23 PM
    State chapters help organize and train members for lawmaker meets and it is very essential that we as a community stand up and speak for ourselves.

    It is very essential that we meet our lawmakers.

    Join the State Chapters now and meet your lawmakers




    hot Navy anchor tattoos navy anchor tattoos. Face Tattoos
  • Face Tattoos


  • abhijitp
    01-28 08:14 PM
    Tomorrow evening, can you rise to the occasion???



    more...

    house Navy Sailor Anchor Tattoo navy anchor tattoos. Anchor Tattoo
  • Anchor Tattoo


  • purgan
    11-09 11:09 AM
    Now that the restrictionists blew the election for the Republicans, they're desperately trying to rally their remaining troops and keep up their morale using immigration scare tactics....

    If the Dems could vote against HR 4437 and for S 2611 in an election year and still win the majority, whose going to care for this piece of S#*t?

    Another interesting observation: Its back to being called a Bush-McCain-Kennedy Amnesty....not the Reid-Kennedy Amnesty...


    ========
    National Review
    "Interesting Opportunities"
    Are amnesty and open borders in our future?

    By Mark Krikorian

    Before election night was even over, White House spokesman Tony Snow said the Democratic takeover of the House presented “interesting opportunities,” including a chance to pass “comprehensive immigration reform” — i.e., the president’s plan for an illegal-alien amnesty and enormous increases in legal immigration, which failed only because of House Republican opposition..

    At his press conference Wednesday, the president repeated this sentiment, citing immigration as “vital issue … where I believe we can find some common ground with the Democrats.”

    Will the president and the Democrats get their way with the new lineup next year?

    Nope.

    That’s not to say the amnesty crowd isn’t hoping for it. Tamar Jacoby, the tireless amnesty supporter at the otherwise conservative Manhattan Institute, in a recent piece in Foreign Affairs eagerly anticipated a Republican defeat, “The political stars will realign, perhaps sooner than anyone expects, and when they do, Congress will return to the task it has been wrestling with: how to translate the emerging consensus into legislation to repair the nation's broken immigration system.”

    In Newsweek, Fareed Zakaria shares Jacoby’s cluelessness about Flyover Land: “The great obstacle to immigration reform has been a noisy minority. … Come Tuesday, the party will be over. CNN’s Lou Dobbs and his angry band of xenophobes will continue to rail, but a new Congress, with fewer Republicans and no impending primary elections, would make the climate much less vulnerable to the tyranny of the minority.”

    And fellow immigration enthusiast Fred Barnes earlier this week blamed the coming Republican defeat in part on the failure to pass an amnesty and increase legal immigration: “But imagine if Republicans had agreed on a compromise and enacted a ‘comprehensive’ — Mr. Bush’s word — immigration bill, dealing with both legal and illegal immigrants. They’d be justifiably basking in their accomplishment. The American public, except for nativist diehards, would be thrilled.”

    “Emerging consensus”? “Nativist diehards”? Jacoby and her fellow-travelers seem to actually believe the results from her hilariously skewed polling questions, and those of the mainstream media, all larded with pro-amnesty codewords like “comprehensive reform” and “earned legalization,” and offering respondents the false choice of mass deportations or amnesty.

    More responsible polling employing neutral language (avoiding accurate but potentially provocative terminology like “amnesty” and “illegal alien”) finds something very different. In a recent national survey by Kellyanne Conway, when told the level of immigration, 68 percent of likely voters said it was too high and only 2 percent said it was too low. Also, when offered the full range of choices of what to do about the existing illegal population, voters rejected both the extremes of legalization (“amnesty” to you and me) and mass deportations; instead, they preferred the approach of this year’s House bill, which sought attrition of the illegal population through consistent immigration law enforcement. Finally, three fourths of likely voters agreed that we have an illegal immigration problem because past enforcement efforts have been “grossly inadequate,” as opposed to the open-borders crowd’s contention that illegal immigration is caused by overly restrictive immigration rules.

    Nor do the results of Tuesday’s balloting bear out the enthusiasts’ claims of a mandate for amnesty. “The test,” Fred Barnes writes, “was in Arizona, where two of the noisiest border hawks, Representatives J.D. Hayworth and Randy Graf, lost House seats.” But while these two somewhat strident voices were defeated (Hayworth voted against the House immigration-enforcement bill because it wasn’t tough enough), the very same voters approved four immigration-related ballot measures by huge margins, to deny bail to illegal aliens, bar illegals from winning punitive damages, bar illegals from receiving state subsidies for education and child care, and declare English the state’s official language.

    More broadly, this was obviously a very bad year for Republicans, leading to the defeat of both enforcement supporters — like John Hostettler (career grade of A- from the pro-control lobbying group Americans for Better Immigration) and Charles Taylor (A) — as well as amnesty promoters, like Mike DeWine (D) and Lincoln Chafee (F). Likewise, the winners included both prominent hawks — Tancredo (A) and Bilbray (A+) — and doves — Lugar (D-), for instance, and probably Heather Wilson (D).

    What’s more, if legalizing illegals is so widely supported by the electorate, how come no Democrats campaigned on it? Not all were as tough as Brad Ellsworth, the Indiana sheriff who defeated House Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Hostettler, or John Spratt of South Carolina, whose immigration web pages might as well have been written by Tom Tancredo. But even those nominally committed to “comprehensive” reform stressed enforcement as job one. And the national party’s “Six for 06” rip-off of the Contract with America said not a word about immigration reform, “comprehensive” or otherwise.

    The only exception to this “Whatever you do, don’t mention the amnesty” approach appears to have been Jim Pederson, the Democrat who challenged Sen. Jon Kyl (a grade of B) by touting a Bush-McCain-Kennedy-style amnesty and foreign-worker program and even praised the 1986 amnesty, which pretty much everyone now agrees was a catastrophe.

    Pederson lost.

    Speaker Pelosi has a single mission for the next two years — to get her majority reelected in 2008. She may be a loony leftist (F- on immigration), but she and Rahm Emanuel (F) seem to be serious about trying to create a bigger tent in order to keep power, and adopting the Bush-McCain-Kennedy amnesty would torpedo those efforts. Sure, it’s likely that they’ll try to move piecemeal amnesties like the DREAM Act (HR 5131 in the current Congress), or increase H-1B visas (the indentured-servitude program for low-wage Indian computer programmers). They might also push the AgJobs bill, which is a sizable amnesty limited to illegal-alien farmworkers. None of these measures is a good idea, and Republicans might still be able to delay or kill them, but they aren’t the “comprehensive” disaster the president and the Democrats really want.

    Any mass-amnesty and worker-importation scheme would take a while to get started, and its effects would begin showing up in the newspapers and in people’s workplaces right about the time the next election season gets under way. And despite the sophistries of open-borders lobbyists, Nancy Pelosi knows perfectly well that this would be bad news for those who supported it.

    —* Mark Krikorian is executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies and an NRO contributor.




    tattoo tinytia#39;s Navy Anchor and Star navy anchor tattoos. My anchor tattoo, in honor of
  • My anchor tattoo, in honor of


  • makemygc
    07-18 11:56 AM
    some people r thinking of flower campaign to atlanta center so as to speed up slowed down processin. if anyone is interested...

    http://www..com/discussion-forums/atlanta-perm/4827173/last-page/

    I don't think it's going to work again plus its only going to annoy people at USCIS as they have to assign someone to accept and trash those flowers.



    more...

    pictures the anchor tattoo that us navy anchor tattoos. loved anchor tattoos,
  • loved anchor tattoos,


  • gk_2000
    01-26 09:41 PM
    Can he add an amendment to divide spillover equally between EB2 and EB3 India. This will help a lot.

    Seeing the number of reds of this kind of views, I feel IV should split into two camps, red and green. Then I will also start expressing these views and embrace red....




    dresses Face Tattoos navy anchor tattoos. U.S. Navy - Tattoo
  • U.S. Navy - Tattoo


  • eb3_nepa
    08-16 04:36 AM
    Hi Guys,

    I am on H1B and my wife is working using her EAD. Like most people on here we applied in the July 2007 rush.

    Now her licence in PA was expiring and we went to renew it and provided ALL necessary documents such as Passport, I-94, current and future EADs. However at the very end after about half an hour of providing documents, the DMV guy said that the system needed "more info" and that he would have to fax everything to Harrisburg who would then contact the INS for the missing info and we would get some "letter" from the DMV.

    Has anyone faced a similar issue in PA before? If so how soon after did they receive this letter? Is there anything I can do to expedite the process such as contacting my local Sentator/Congressman's office? We have a small baby and my wife needs to drive to go to work.

    Thanks.



    more...

    makeup Anchor Tattoos,anchor Tattoo navy anchor tattoos. Navy Sailor Anchor Tattoo
  • Navy Sailor Anchor Tattoo


  • potatoeater
    05-10 02:00 PM
    Dude, you revived a 6 month old thread just to ask this innocuous question? And the title of this thread is pretty alarming.

    Expect 5 thousand red dots now. Everybody will come down on you like a ton of bricks.

    To admins..

    we should have some facility to automatically close the threads that have been inactive for a while.

    Guys,
    I have a long layover at New Delhi airport. I am reaching their at 8PM and my next flight in the morning at 7:30AM. Is there any accommodation facility within airport? Or Do i need to go to city? This is the first time, i am going through delhi airport. Any helpful comments are welcome. Thanks and appreciate your help.

    -Kumaresh




    girlfriend My anchor tattoo, in honor of navy anchor tattoos. Navy anchor tattoo
  • Navy anchor tattoo


  • raysaikat
    01-06 02:06 PM
    Hi Harry mine was an EB2 case to begin with, no porting. Only this is my timing was not correct and I missed the Jul 07 window, the labor filing took way too long. So kind of in the same boat as you, trying to find legal avenues to upgrade to EB1. Let�s wait for some advice to come by. Looking at your case as well I believe that EB1-A is the only option.

    There is nothing called "upgrade". You can file a second I-140 as EB1-A in parallel. Other than the money and energy spent, there is no downside. AFAIK, there is no "eligibility" for filing EB1-A. In the petition, you must demonstrate that you meet the minimum number of criteria described by USCIS.

    USCIS - EB-1 Eligibility and Filing (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=3a4df271ab0fd010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=91919c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD)




    hairstyles SAILOR WITH ANCHOR TATTOO navy anchor tattoos. This is the anchor tattoo I
  • This is the anchor tattoo I


  • hebbar77
    03-15 02:14 PM
    First thing is when u have higher salary , u got nothing to worry.
    Next job tittle/description have to be similar in words not only in nature(becos USCIS officers are not tichnical folks, they just match words). Also it has to be in similar job code. This code is in the ETA* form filed during the labor phase by ur current employer.

    But you can do AC21 with EAD or H1. H1 is safer than EAD.




    YesGC_NoGC
    06-20 01:34 PM
    Yes I do agree with you to move on without worry!! As I mentioned that I had made up my mind to accept the position and skip informing USCIS as i read at some places , that it is optional to inform.

    However The Immigration guys (from the prospective employer) saiid that DOL may not like the word "MANAGER" in my case and this can cause issues at later point of time. And They have policy to send letter to USCIS.

    I am looking at looking at options...let's see what is the outcome.

    Thanks




    Guys: I have invoked my AC21 and am a consultant PM though my LC mentions "Programmer/Analyst". I came to this country because it is a land of opportunity and have been in the US for over 9 years now. I can't let this stupid AC21 provisions of "Same or Similar occupation" scepter of fear stop me from moving forward.

    I'm also looking for a Full-time job as a Manager and if I get it I intend on taking it in a heart-beat without worrying about the consequences. Hey, it's not like I'm doing something illegal but merely exercising my due growth in my career. So, I'm moving on and if something bad were to happen like a NOID or a RFE, I'm ready to pack my bags back home with a satisfaction that I was atleast in the driver's seat.

    My 2 cents but please do what is right for you.




    katewill
    08-24 01:20 PM
    180K per BEC and 2 of them so 360K cases overall.
    hello days go by,
    kinda new here.
    is there a way to find out, out of 360K case overall, how many are EB1, EB2 or EB3? Or how many files in year 01, 02, and 03?

    overheard most are EB2/3 cases and not many 245i cases.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment